Specification Quality Checklist: Public API Endpoint Authentication
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-07-23 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- All items pass on first draft. The three key design decisions (guest-JWT mechanism vs. proxy-secret, full scope of previously-public routers, and keeping this as a separate spec from 017-exception-handling-guideline) were already resolved with the user before this spec was drafted, so no [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers were needed.
- The
before_specifygit-branch-creation hook (speckit.git.feature) was intentionally skipped: the current branch (017-exception-handling-guideline) has substantial uncommitted work in progress, and switching/creating a branch now would risk entangling 017's uncommitted changes with 018..specify/feature.jsonwas updated to point at this feature directory regardless, since downstream/speckit-plan//speckit-tasksresolve the feature directory from that file, not from the git branch name. Per explicit user instruction (2026-07-23), no new branch will be created at all — this feature is implemented directly on017-exception-handling-guideline. /speckit-clarifysession (2026-07-23, 4 questions) resolved: guest token statelessness (no DB row), access/refresh token split with a 1-hour access-token lifetime, a stable cross-refresh guest identifier, and retiringchat.py's existing cookie/ip-hash guest identification in favor of the new token. All items still pass after integrating these answers.